| Integer Interferogram Combination |
![]() |
It is possible to stack several interferograms of the same
site to increase their clarity or reduce the number of fringes, thus creating
an integer interferogram combination (IIC) [R13]. The combined interferogram can
have a better altitude of ambiguity ha
than any of the source interferograms.
After correction for topographic and orbital contributions,
the interferogram contains three kinds of information:
The interferogram in which the effects of topography and the
'orbital fringes' have been retrieved gives us the fractional part of:

If we multiply the interferogram by an integer q1, we will likewise multiply
the number of phase transitions and the initial integer values. Note that the
integer values remain unknown unless unwrapping has been performed. We obtain the
fractional part of:

If we combine the first interferogram with a second,
characterised by another independent noise distribution, another altitude of
ambiguity, other differential effects and another multiplication factor q2, but the same local DEM
error ε , we obtain the fractional
part of:

As a consequence of the multiplications, the RMS amplitude
of the noise becomes:

This resulting increase of the noise in practice limits the
choice of the absolute value of q1
or q2 to less than 3.
The interferogram resulting from this kind of combination
exhibits an equivalent altitude of ambiguity hae, written as:

Phase unwrapping applies to altitudes of ambiguity lower
than 100–200 m and greater than 10 m
in interferometric conditions. Even choosing q1 and q2
to be ±1, ±2, or ±3 allows us to reach an equivalent altitude of ambiguity of
more than 100 m most of the time. Using this method, we create more interferometric
combinations with a high altitude of ambiguity, as if we had a small orbital
separation.